Etekcity EK6015 Kitchen Scale Review: My €11.04 Test
Etekcity EK6015 kitchen scale review — my one-day hands-on verdict: 3.7/5. I bought this stainless-steel Etekcity scale on October 8, 2026, for €11.04, using my own money, without a discount or compensation. I tried weighing a cashew nut, a marker and a one-liter carton. The scale showed 2 g, 10 g and 1,063 g, respectively. It can register a very light cashew, which is a useful result for an everyday scale with 1 g display steps.
However, my biggest impressions were not just about the numbers: the bright blue LCD was difficult to read, especially through a camera, and the buttons could be awkward to press. At almost €4.25 more than the HomeFashion scale I bought, I did not feel that it provided a meaningfully better overall experience. It may be worth considering if you particularly want this model or a very recognizable brand, but I have not tested Etekcity’s long-term reliability or verified that its brand reputation makes it more durable.
My first choice for most budget-conscious home cooks remains the HomeFashion 5kg scale, which cost me €6.79 and also registered a cashew at 2 g. For my own kitchen I still prefer 15 kg maximum capacity instead of the 5 kg available on either of these compact scales. A different displayed result is not necessarily an accuracy error, and my trial used no laboratory-standard calibration weights.
Affiliate disclosure: JonTests may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through the paid Amazon links on this page, without any extra charge to you. I bought this exact model myself without a discount, payment or free product. My conclusions are independent of Amazon commissions. The owner-provided paid short URL is preserved exactly in the two purchase points, but the final redirect, stock, exact variant and affiliate tracking have not been independently verified, so check model EK6015 before buying. See the affiliate disclosure.
My test: one day · 2 g cashew · 10 g marker · 1,063 g carton
What I paid: €11.04 on October 8, 2026
Paid Amazon link · confirm EK6015, 5 kg silver version · shortlink destination/tracking not independently verified
Etekcity EK6015 Digital Kitchen Scale — 3.7/5
My verdict: Useful small-object readings and a practical 5 kg capacity, but an uncomfortable display and buttons make it harder to recommend at the price I paid.
Best result: A single cashew showed 2 g. This proves it detected that item in my trial, not that its absolute accuracy has been calibrated.
Biggest drawbacks: Difficult-to-read bright LCD (especially in photos), controls that take some effort and a price higher than my preferred HomeFashion.
Best for: Buyers happy to pay a little more for this specific Etekcity model who want a 5 kg kitchen platform scale. I would not choose it based on a presumed brand durability advantage without testing.
My own choice: HomeFashion for low-price 5 kg weighing, or a model with 15 kg headroom for my kitchen.
What worked
- Registered the cashew at 2 g and the marker at 10 g
- Handled a one-liter carton, showing 1,063 g in my test
- Stainless-steel platform and low-profile shape
- Manufacturer lists tare, several units and 5 kg rated capacity
- Real original photos and direct comparison with my other scales
What held it back
- Blue-backlit numbers felt difficult to read, especially on camera
- Buttons could be difficult to press or operate
- €11.04 was €4.25 more than my HomeFashion purchase
- Both HomeFashion and Etekcity showed 2 g for cashew: no proven low-weight advantage
- Only 5 kg capacity; I prefer 15 kg
- One-day test cannot establish accuracy margins or longevity
Bottom line
3.7/5: A reasonably capable small kitchen scale, but not the best value I have tested. HomeFashion makes more sense for most shoppers at the prices I paid, while the Etekcity does not have a demonstrated precision advantage in these tests.
My cashew test: 2 g, but not proof of better accuracy
For the smallest item, a cashew nut, the Etekcity displayed 2 g. That is a positive sign that it can register some very light ingredients. The HomeFashion 5kg scale also showed 2 g for a small cashew in my separate test. From these numbers alone I cannot say that Etekcity is more accurate below 10 g, even though it might be tempting to assume a higher-priced brand must perform better.
One gram of display resolution is not a certified accuracy tolerance or a reliable minimum-load specification. I did not weigh the cashew using a calibrated reference instrument, record a series of known one-gram test masses or compare multiple production units. So the useful, defensible finding is the scale detected the small nut and gave a 2 g reading, not a claim of laboratory-verified ±1 g accuracy.
My other test objects: a 10 g marker and a 1,063 g carton
I placed a marker on the platform and it displayed 10 g. A one-liter drink carton then showed 1,063 g according to my recorded test result. These readings suggest the device handles different everyday quantities, but the marker and the carton were not independently weighed on a certified scale. A larger displayed mass is not automatically evidence of absolute accuracy.
These were one-day, real-item weighing tests. I did not systematically check whether the scale always returns exactly the same reading after removing and replacing each object, so I am not making a measured repeatability claim. The first-hand observations are useful for comparing ease of use and whether objects register, but a reference-weight procedure would be necessary to compare true precision.
The backlit display was one of my main complaints
A backlit screen can be attractive in a product listing, but I had difficulty reading this one in practice, particularly through my camera. The display is bright blue and the digits can be tricky to capture clearly on photographs. This was a meaningful usability drawback for me, not a reason to discard a perfectly functioning weight result. I cannot say every person or lighting setup will have the same problem.
The buttons were harder to use than I wanted
I also struggled somewhat with the controls. They did respond, but pressing them was less comfortable or intuitive than I would like in a kitchen scale. This matters when you want to tare a bowl or switch measurement units repeatedly while cooking. I would not call this a broken-button defect; it is my own hands-on criticism of their usability, and I did not measure electronics response time.
Platform, 5 kg limit and practical fit
The EK6015 has a stainless-steel platform and an unobtrusive low-profile body. Etekcity lists a maximum of 5,000 g / 11 lb and measurements in 1 g increments. Its slim footprint is convenient if you have limited room, but a large mixing bowl can occupy much of the weighing area. My personal preference is a scale rated for 15 kg, especially for heavier vessels or larger batches. I did not check the upper limit using certified 5 kg weights.
The manufacturer gives dimensions of approximately 18.6 × 14.5 × 1.55 cm and lists two AAA batteries. It supports the tare/zero function and changes among weight and liquid-oriented units such as g, oz, lb:oz, mL and fl oz. These are official specifications, not features for which I am claiming an extensive separate hands-on test.
Etekcity EK6015 specifications
| Feature | Etekcity specification or my direct observation |
|---|---|
| Exact model | EK6015, silver stainless-steel kitchen scale |
| Maximum listed weight | 5,000 g / 11 lb; not independently fully loaded |
| Graduations | 1 g; not proof of 1 g true measurement error |
| Modes/units | g, oz, lb:oz, mL and fl oz, according to Etekcity |
| Tare and unit controls | Yes; I found the buttons comparatively awkward to press |
| Screen | Blue-backlit LCD; difficult to read especially on camera during my test |
| Dimensions | About 186 × 145 × 15.5 mm, manufacturer specification |
| Battery | 2 × 1.5 V AAA, manufacturer specification |
| Auto power-off | About 120 seconds as listed by manufacturer; timing not verified in my trial |
| Date and price I paid | October 8, 2026; €11.04, self-funded without discount |
| Actual test period | One day |
Etekcity versus HomeFashion: is paying more worthwhile?
This is the comparison that matters most to me. Etekcity cost €11.04, while the HomeFashion cost €6.79. That is €4.25 more, or roughly 63% higher for Etekcity at my actual purchase prices. Both models list 5 kg maximum capacity and both registered a small cashew at 2 g.
Etekcity might have a stronger reputation as a brand, but that is not something I verified through an independent reliability study, and a brand name alone is not evidence that a particular unit will last longer or be more accurate. What I did notice was the more difficult-to-read display and less satisfying buttons. For most budget-conscious shoppers, HomeFashion is the more sensible purchase based on my firsthand tests and what I paid. Price and stock may differ when you shop.
| What I compared | Etekcity EK6015 | HomeFashion 5kg |
|---|---|---|
| What I paid | €11.04, without discount | €6.79, without discount |
| Hands-on testing | One day | One day |
| Small cashew | 2 g displayed | 2 g displayed |
| Rated weight capacity | 5 kg | 5 kg |
| Screen experience | Difficult to read, especially through the camera | Blue display okay in person, difficult to photograph |
| Controls | Could be awkward to press | Worked well and felt relatively quick |
| Absolute low-gram accuracy | Unverified: no calibrated weights | Unverified: no calibrated weights |
| My overall choice | Not my preferred budget buy | Better value for me |
I would not describe Etekcity as objectively more precise than HomeFashion based on these tests. The clearest advantages I can substantiate for the HomeFashion are lower purchase price and a better control experience. I am keeping the broader comparison of around seven kitchen scales for a separately documented buying guide. My other individual tests include the ADE KE2500-1 (15 kg) and the Soehnle Cooking Star weighing spoon. Those models address different needs; neither comparison establishes the Etekcity’s calibrated accuracy.
Who might still choose Etekcity?
- Consider it if the EK6015’s appearance, size, availability or retailer support suits you and you do not mind its screen/button feel.
- Consider it if you routinely weigh small ordinary ingredients, but verify performance with reliable test weights if a few grams matter to your recipe.
- Choose HomeFashion instead if you prioritize the best value I observed at my own purchase prices.
- Choose a 15 kg scale if you want more capacity for heavy bowls or big batches; I personally prefer that headroom.
- Choose a purpose-built precision scale for accurately measuring tiny sub-gram amounts rather than assuming a kitchen scale’s 1 g steps are a calibration guarantee.
How I arrived at my 3.7/5 editorial rating
This rating is an early first-hand editorial judgment about how useful Etekcity is for its price and kitchen role. It is not an Amazon aggregate rating, a laboratory calibration result or a durability guarantee. I use six evidence-linked criteria; the weights add to 100%, and I do not give a separate score for untested months of longevity or pretend the brand name proves quality.
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detecting small objects | 25% | 4.6/5 | My cashew showed a nonzero 2 g reading, though actual mass unverified |
| Ordinary-object weighing | 15% | 4.1/5 | 10 g marker and 1,063 g carton, without certified cross-checks |
| Display legibility | 15% | 3.0/5 | Blue numbers were comparatively hard to read, especially on camera |
| Button usability | 15% | 3.0/5 | Controls worked but were somewhat difficult to press |
| Capacity and platform suitability | 10% | 3.5/5 | 5 kg suits many cooks; I personally want 15 kg |
| Value at €11.04 | 20% | 3.4/5 | Sensible absolute price but €4.25 more than preferred HomeFashion |
Calculation: (4.6 × 0.25) + (4.1 × 0.15) + (3.0 × 0.15) + (3.0 × 0.15) + (3.5 × 0.10) + (3.4 × 0.20) = 3.695 → 3.7/5. This is a score for my early-use experience, not a precision specification. I would revisit it after calibrated testing and long-term use. See How I Test for our editorial approach.
Frequently asked questions
Can the Etekcity EK6015 weigh a 2 g cashew?
Yes, in my one-day test the LCD displayed 2 g for a small cashew. That does not mean I verified its actual mass was exactly 2.000 g or established a reliable detection threshold for every EK6015.
Is Etekcity more accurate than HomeFashion under 10 g?
I cannot establish that. Both showed 2 g for a cashew during my tests, but no calibrated reference weights were used. The higher price alone is not proof of better accuracy.
Does the screen work well?
It works, but I found its blue-backlit display harder to read than I would like, particularly when filming or photographing the scale.
How much weight can it hold?
Etekcity lists 5 kg / 11 lb maximum capacity. I did not independently test the full rated load, and I prefer more capacity for my own kitchen.
Would I pay €11.04 for Etekcity again?
I would generally opt for my cheaper HomeFashion scale instead. I might reconsider if Etekcity were competitively priced or if stronger independently verified durability evidence justified the extra cost, but neither applied in my test.
Sources, photos and editorial disclosure
Product specifications were checked against Etekcity’s official EK6015 page and my original packaging. The owner-supplied Amazon.de reference (ASIN B0113UZJE2) is for identifying the product and is not used as the paid purchase destination. The paid image and button use exactly https://link.amazon/B0faOTEjV. All seven photos show my own scale, tests and packaging; I bought it October 8, 2026 for €11.04 without compensation and tested for only one day. No calibrated accuracy, formal repeated-measurement study, full-load certification or long-term reliability trial was performed. The current Amazon shortlink redirect and commission attribution have not been independently verified.
Compare the other scales I bought: See my Best Kitchen Scales 2026 guide for an original-photo comparison of 10 weighing tools, the actual small-item readouts, capacity trade-offs and the model I ultimately kept. This individual review remains the full source for this product’s first-hand evidence.
